45%
Rural firms
37%
Urban firms
said they always consider the environmental implications of business decisions
The climate emergency emphasises the need for businesses to move towards net zero. This research explores and compares the environmental attitudes and practices of rural and urban-based businesses.
Rural firms
Urban firms
said they always consider the environmental implications of business decisions
Rural firms
Urban firms
said that environmental impact should be part of a business’s bottom line
Rural firms
Urban firms
had these in place
These include monitoring air pollution, investigating low carbon products and services and investing in environment-related research and development
Rural firms often run their businesses differently than urban firms, as evidenced by their lower adoption of business planning activities, their lower likelihood to export, and their different business priorities. This may influence the way that they approach environmental issues.
We found differences between rural and urban firms’ attitudes towards, and engagement with, environmental issues. Rural firms are more likely than urban firms to approach environmental issues positively, are more engaged with, and invested in, environmental practices, and are leading the way when it comes to integrating environmental priorities into their business models.
Rural firms appear to be motivated by different external factors than urban firms when contemplating the adoption of environmental practices, notably grants and reducing costs. Rural firms experience different barriers to net zero adoption than urban firms, notably administrative procedures.
Policies and measures to address these specific circumstances will need to be designed to reach rural firms. Overall, underlying differences in attitudes and business models suggest that firm location (e.g., urban or rural context) should be considered when developing policy and initiatives to encourage wider adoption of net zero practices.
Loading...