When shown a well-framed case, 76-77% of people we polled supported investing more resources into rural England, compared to 1-4% who opposed it.
Overview
How language can help or hinder the case for rural investment
Framing is a way of positioning an issue so as to connect emotionally with your audience. It can make the difference between winning support or indifference, not through manipulation but by tapping into beliefs and values that people already hold.
In Framing Rural, we wanted to examine how this concept could inform approaches to building a case for support for rural investment. We spoke with people campaigning for rural England and asked them what misconceptions they regularly come up against. We then looked at common ways of talking about rural places and asked members of the public how they felt about them. From this, we learnt how best to frame a case for investing more in rural places and then applied those insights when we polled more than 3,500 people.
The polling results suggest that, if the framing is right, people support rural investment. But the strongest support was for the idea that everyone should have access to basic services, regardless of where they live in the country. This may suggest that when it comes to making a case for rural investment, it could be most persuasive to appeal to people’s sense that everyone should have access to basic services regardless of where they live.